Note: Yesterday, Sarah Morino, a fantastic landscape photographer based in the US, put together a list of over 165 women landscape photographers. She did not post this to share a “best of” list, but to create a go-to resource for companies and brands to realize that there are, in fact, a large amount of professional female landscape photographers in the world (and that list is still growing).
I don’t know what the actual men-to-women ratio is for professional photographers, but by acquaintances and perceptions alone, it just cannot not be skewed as much as it may seem. I’ve had this article (below) in my queue for a few weeks, and after reading Sarah’s article I was motivated to dust it off and finally publish it. Here are my thoughts:
It has always been important to me to maintain my own unique business presence nad social identity, regardless of who I work with. I have my own unique brand and style, and each and every one of us has our own strengths and weaknesses. However, one fear I have had is that I would be overlooked or “lumped together” with a male business partner, and thus become the “invisible” part of the duo. I’ve noticed this with other couples who work together, and have always been careful to not put myself in that position.
The reason that I overthink all of this is because I am a woman, and in our industry there seem to be a lot more men in the spotlight. But should the fact that I am female really matter in the world of photography? I would like to think that it should not, but the older and more experienced I become in this field, the more sensitive I become to how women are portrayed. I never considered myself to be ultra-feminist or a women’s rights activist by any means, and throughout my career thus far I have always felt that I had the same opportunities (if not more so) than my male counterparts. I also have rarely (but not never) experienced others treating me as less of as a professional because of my gender. And I hope that people are interested (or not interested) in my work because of me and my photography, not because I am a woman.
When I look at events that cater to high-profile photographers, such as conferences and expos, or sponsors for a particular brand of photography equipment, there seems to be a definite gender bias towards men. The off-balance ratio of women-to-men is likely not intentional, but the numbers don’t lie. Here is a short list of a some of the ambassador programs, along with a few conferences and their instructor/speaker ratio (as of August 2015):
- Nikon Ambassadors: 24% women (6 women, 19 men)
- Canon Explorers of Light: 14% women (5 women, 29 men)
- Sony Artisans (USA): 20% women (6 women, 24 men)
- Fuji X Photographers (Worldwide): 7% (27 women, 375 men)
- Olympus Visionaries: 25% women (3 women, 9 men)
- f-stop (Global Icon): 10% (3 women, 28 men)
- f-stop (Local Hero): 4% women (6 women, 158 men)
- Lowepro Ambassadors: 25% women (2 women, 6 men)
- G-Technology (G-Team): 13% women (3 women, 20 men)
- Photoshop World Instructors: 13% women (6 women, 41 men)
- Gulf Photo Plus Speakers: 21% women (3 women, 11 men)
- WPPI 2016 Speakers: 38% women (66 women, 109 men)
- Great Smokey Mountain Photography Summit (2015): 0% women (0 women, 13 men)
- Team Induro: 13% women (1 woman, 8 men)
It seems to me that there must be more women photographers in the world than what are represented above. And yes, I do realize that it’s not a full list (and I did my very best deciphering the genders of some foreign names that did not have a bio image of the photographer!). It would be great to put together a comprehensive database of all of the conferences and photography-related ambassador programs. If you have any you would like me to add to the list above, please let me know!
Not all companies are doing a poor job of representing women in photography. There are in fact organizations that cater to women, such as Click’n’Moms (an online community and conference catered to, but not exclusively for, women), and WPPI (Wedding & Portrait Photographers International) was also more well-balanced than the rest. But it seems too often that if you’re not a part of the “good ‘ole boys club” with most other groups then it’s easy to get swept aside or unnoticed.
So why are things so out of balance? Do men, in general, have more confidence or larger egos than women, so they find themselves in the spotlight more often? Do companies prefer to work with men instead of women? Do more women photographers choose to have children and raise a family, pulling them away from other opportunities (such as travel or full-time gigs)? What the heck is it!?!
Look, I’m not advocating for a forced gender balance. I don’t believe that photographers should be included, excluded, or given an advantage or opportunity because of their gender. In fact, I would be very interested to see actual statistics and job info on the ratio of men-to-women in this field, and maybe that information is out there somewhere.
Out of curiosity, I decided to create my own survey, to collect my own data on men and women in photography. It won’t be scientific, but it may give a general idea of the percentage of men and women in photography. All responses are anonymous (it’s just a few simple questions):
[standout-css3-button cssclass=”button-turquoise” href=”https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/genders-in-photography”]Click Here to Complete the Survey[/standout-css3-button]
All responses are anonymous. If you want to view the live results, click here
I don’t think that there is an easy way to make things more balanced. There are just too many variables involved to really come to a conclusion or a solution, if there even is such a thing. But these imbalances do affect women. My long rant about camera bags sheds light on one issue in regards to gear, and soon after I wrote that article, forward-thinking companies like fstop announced a female version of their wonderful adventure photography packs. It’s an uphill battle, and I suspect it might take a few more generations of photographers before the playing field is finally leveled.