Images with this post were all photographed with the Canon 40mm lens on a Canon 5DMkIII body.
Product link: http://amzn.to/PXf8L1
Cost: ~$200
When I saw this lens on the market I was immediately excited about it. I really like the ~40mm focal length (used it a lot with my Fuji x100) and the fact that this is a pancake lens (which basically means it has a very small, compact form-factor) and only $200 made the decision to buy it that much easier. I waited around to hear some initial thoughts on the lens, basically to find out if it was awful or not, and when I read good things about it I made the plunge.
And I love it.
I got this lens just before heading out to Nebraska to visit family a few weeks ago, and used it about 99% of the time when I was photographing my nieces and nephews. I wanted to test it out (the main reason I used it the most) but then I found that I liked it so much that whenever I put another lens on I immediately changed my mind and switched back to the 40mm. Here’s a run-down of some of the things I noticed about the lens:
Sharpness
While I haven’t done any “lab-worthy” testing of the quality of sharpness, from my very organic and natural shooting moments it was spot on. I was photographing kids who have the attention span of about 5 seconds, so the fact that I got so many tack-sharp photographs was a huge deal to me. Granted, it’s not as ridiculously sharp as some of my pro “L” lenses, but I’m a self-proclaimed “focus snob” and if I’m happy with the sharpness (hand-held with unruly subjects) then that means it’s pretty darn good. In terms of focusing speed, I never really noticed it being too slow and was able to get photos of kids in a reasonable time … so I’m guessing that it’s fast enough for most situations.
Image quality
So far I haven’t seen anything wrong with the overall image quality, particularly in terms of distortion and chromatic aberration (CA). The distortion is what I would expect with a 40mm lens, not bad or overly stretching anything along the edges, and I actually quite like the results. I think this will make a very nice “overhead” lens for my food photography when I want to shoot straight down on my subject from above. In terms of CA I really haven’t seen any in my normal photos (but I haven’t tested it in any extremely high-contrast situations or with anything chrome or shiny). Since a lot of my images are for stock photogrpahy the quality when viewed at 100% is very important to me, and the less I have to do to get rid of things like CA, the better. :)
Compact size
The physical size of this lens is one of the main reasons I wanted to try it out. The size of it allows me to put my camera (particularly my 5DMkIII) in any of my camera bags without having to remove the lens, which makes it much easier when I need to grab my camera for a “quick shot”. It’s also very discreet in comparison to most SLR lenses. I walked around Seattle yesterday with my Canon 60D and the 40mm and it was such a nice little setup. I never had to worry about the lens bumping into things or getting in the way. Plus, it tucks away quite nicely and even fits easily into my Kelly Moore bag with the lens attached to the camera (which I can’t really say for any of my other lenses).
Build quality
If you’ve ever had a “nifty fifty” lens, like the Canon 50mm f/1.8, you’ll understand that you typically get plastic mounts with a lens that costs this little. However, with the 40mm the mount is metal and solid. It feels sturdy for a lens of this size and price-point.
Cost
Seriously … for $200, how can you go wrong? I don’t really feel like I compromised anything with buying this lens, and got much more than I expected.
A minor “con”
I found that every so often when I would turn my camera (a 5DMkIII) with the lens already attached the focus mechanism wouldn’t kick-in. I had to press the lens-release and turn the lens so it was no longer attached to the camera, and then turn it to “click” it back into the mount. After doing that it worked fine. This doesn’t happen every time, so I’m not sure if it’s a glitch with my camera, or if it’s the lens itself … or maybe it was just temporary. Either way, it’s not enough for me to say anything bad about the lens. :)
Final thoughts
I expect to be using the lens a lot in the near future. It’s a good size for a simple walk-around/photowalk lens, and it will always be in my camera bag when I travel. It’s so, so small that I don’t really even consider it an “extra lens” when I’m short on space … it’s really more like a “fancy” lens cap/combination lens. And, for those of you Canon photogs who need a simple “nifty fifty”, consider spending a little bit more to get the 40mm.
Images with this post were all photographed with the Canon 40mm lens on a Canon 5DMkIII body.
Product link: http://amzn.to/PXf8L1
Cost: ~$200
When I saw this lens on the market I was immediately excited about it. I really like the ~40mm focal length (used it a lot with my Fuji x100) and the fact that this is a pancake lens (which basically means it has a very small, compact form-factor) and only $200 made the decision to buy it that much easier. I waited around to hear some initial thoughts on the lens, basically to find out if it was awful or not, and when I read good things about it I made the plunge.
And I love it.
I got this lens just before heading out to Nebraska to visit family a few weeks ago, and used it about 99% of the time when I was photographing my nieces and nephews. I wanted to test it out (the main reason I used it the most) but then I found that I liked it so much that whenever I put another lens on I immediately changed my mind and switched back to the 40mm. Here’s a run-down of some of the things I noticed about the lens:
Sharpness
While I haven’t done any “lab-worthy” testing of the quality of sharpness, from my very organic and natural shooting moments it was spot on. I was photographing kids who have the attention span of about 5 seconds, so the fact that I got so many tack-sharp photographs was a huge deal to me. Granted, it’s not as ridiculously sharp as some of my pro “L” lenses, but I’m a self-proclaimed “focus snob” and if I’m happy with the sharpness (hand-held with unruly subjects) then that means it’s pretty darn good. In terms of focusing speed, I never really noticed it being too slow and was able to get photos of kids in a reasonable time … so I’m guessing that it’s fast enough for most situations.
Image quality
So far I haven’t seen anything wrong with the overall image quality, particularly in terms of distortion and chromatic aberration (CA). The distortion is what I would expect with a 40mm lens, not bad or overly stretching anything along the edges, and I actually quite like the results. I think this will make a very nice “overhead” lens for my food photography when I want to shoot straight down on my subject from above. In terms of CA I really haven’t seen any in my normal photos (but I haven’t tested it in any extremely high-contrast situations or with anything chrome or shiny). Since a lot of my images are for stock photogrpahy the quality when viewed at 100% is very important to me, and the less I have to do to get rid of things like CA, the better. :)
Compact size
The physical size of this lens is one of the main reasons I wanted to try it out. The size of it allows me to put my camera (particularly my 5DMkIII) in any of my camera bags without having to remove the lens, which makes it much easier when I need to grab my camera for a “quick shot”. It’s also very discreet in comparison to most SLR lenses. I walked around Seattle yesterday with my Canon 60D and the 40mm and it was such a nice little setup. I never had to worry about the lens bumping into things or getting in the way. Plus, it tucks away quite nicely and even fits easily into my Kelly Moore bag with the lens attached to the camera (which I can’t really say for any of my other lenses).
Build quality
If you’ve ever had a “nifty fifty” lens, like the Canon 50mm f/1.8, you’ll understand that you typically get plastic mounts with a lens that costs this little. However, with the 40mm the mount is metal and solid. It feels sturdy for a lens of this size and price-point.
Cost
Seriously … for $200, how can you go wrong? I don’t really feel like I compromised anything with buying this lens, and got much more than I expected.
A minor “con”
I found that every so often when I would turn my camera (a 5DMkIII) with the lens already attached the focus mechanism wouldn’t kick-in. I had to press the lens-release and turn the lens so it was no longer attached to the camera, and then turn it to “click” it back into the mount. After doing that it worked fine. This doesn’t happen every time, so I’m not sure if it’s a glitch with my camera, or if it’s the lens itself … or maybe it was just temporary. Either way, it’s not enough for me to say anything bad about the lens. :)
Final thoughts
I expect to be using the lens a lot in the near future. It’s a good size for a simple walk-around/photowalk lens, and it will always be in my camera bag when I travel. It’s so, so small that I don’t really even consider it an “extra lens” when I’m short on space … it’s really more like a “fancy” lens cap/combination lens. And, for those of you Canon photogs who need a simple “nifty fifty”, consider spending a little bit more to get the 40mm.
Nicole is a photographer, published author, and educator specializing in Lightroom, Photoshop, and photography. She is best known for her books on food photography but is widely versed in various photographic genres, including landscape, nature, stock, travel, and experimental imagery.
Great review, a friend of mine has this lens and loves it too. It's on my list.
Great review, a friend of mine has this lens and loves it too. It's on my list.
Thanks for the post.
Will probably buy it. I'm also waiting on the upcoming July 23 Canon announcement of perhaps a mirrorless camera, which would go perfectly with this lens.
Thanks for the post.
Will probably buy it. I'm also waiting on the upcoming July 23 Canon announcement of perhaps a mirrorless camera, which would go perfectly with this lens.
Thanks +Nicole S. Young for the write-up and photos! Thinking of getting one for my Canon 40D.
Thanks +Nicole S. Young for the write-up and photos! Thinking of getting one for my Canon 40D.
+Alec Style Yes, I'm totally with you there. I'm hopeful that it's why they made this lens in the first place … a Canon mirrorless has so much potential.
+John Balboni This lens is perfect for compact SLRs. It ends up at around 65mm-ish or so on a crop-sensor, which is not as cropped as a 50mm lens would push it to.
+Alec Style Yes, I'm totally with you there. I'm hopeful that it's why they made this lens in the first place … a Canon mirrorless has so much potential.
+John Balboni This lens is perfect for compact SLRs. It ends up at around 65mm-ish or so on a crop-sensor, which is not as cropped as a 50mm lens would push it to.
Thanks +Nicole S. Young for the "real world" review. Very insightful.
Thanks +Nicole S. Young for the "real world" review. Very insightful.
Had it for a week now. I had the same minor “con". The mount is very stiff and scratchy. The problem is the locking click is very soft and does not provide sufficient tactile feedback of a confirm lock. Quite an inconvience having to unlock and retwist and losing the moment. Focus lock occassionaly takes a tat too slow unlike USM lenses and likewise losing the moment.
Had it for a week now. I had the same minor “con". The mount is very stiff and scratchy. The problem is the locking click is very soft and does not provide sufficient tactile feedback of a confirm lock. Quite an inconvenience having to unlock and retwist and losing the moment. Focus lock occassionaly takes a tat too slow unlike USM lenses and likewise losing the moment.
Want
Want
I can third the same "con" behavior so it definitely isn't your camera.
I can third the same "con" behavior so it definitely isn't your camera.
Thank you so much for this post,it is filled with information that is very helpful +Nicole S. Young The photo are wonderful as well! It's wonderful that you were blessed to spend time with your family and record your fun. :)
Thank you so much for this post,it is filled with information that is very helpful +Nicole S. Young The photo are wonderful as well! It's wonderful that you were blessed to spend time with your family and record your fun. :)
The "con" behaviour is the design. The focus is not mechanically connected to the ring. The lens has to be powered up to respond. It goes to sleep quite quickly. I'm enjoying mine too.
The "con" behaviour is the design. The focus is not mechanically connected to the ring. The lens has to be powered up to respond. It goes to sleep quite quickly. I'm enjoying mine too.
Thanks for the review. Do you think you could post some photos from your 60D, or any cropped sensor camera? I have a 30D, and I'm wondering how photos would look.
Also, do you find the 40mm too long for a cropped sensor?
Thanks for the review. Do you think you could post some photos from your 60D, or any cropped sensor camera? I have a 30D, and I'm wondering how photos would look.
Also, do you find the 40mm too long for a cropped sensor?
I bought it when I bought my markiii and love the lens. It turns your dslr into a point in shoot on steroids. I agree and you can't go wrong for $200. I took my camera on a 1 hour walk and no way in hell would I have done that if I had my 24-70mm on there. It fits in the smallest of places and it's a sweet little lens. Seriously, if you are on the fence just get it. You won't regret it.
I bought it when I bought my markiii and love the lens. It turns your dslr into a point in shoot on steroids. I agree and you can't go wrong for $200. I took my camera on a 1 hour walk and no way in hell would I have done that if I had my 24-70mm on there. It fits in the smallest of places and it's a sweet little lens. Seriously, if you are on the fence just get it. You won't regret it.
The 50mm is faster, not much longer, and way cheaper. I would still stay with the 50mm. Can't see investing in this lens unless you don't already have a portrait lens. But it does look cool. I wonder why they didn't go with 1.8?
The 50mm is faster, not much longer, and way cheaper. I would still stay with the 50mm. Can't see investing in this lens unless you don't already have a portrait lens. But it does look cool. I wonder why they didn't go with 1.8?
The "minor con" is a real problem. This lens will at times unable to autofocus. One has to unlock the lens twist open and relock to kick start the AF. This is a not good. One can't be waste time doing this and losing 'the moment'.
The "minor con" is a real problem. This lens will at times unable to autofocus. One has to unlock the lens twist open and relock to kick start the AF. This is a not good. One can't be wasting time doing this and losing 'the moment'.
I've only had it happen twice. That's two times more than it should have but (luckily) I haven't missed an important shot because of that.
I've only had it happen twice. That's two times more than it should have but (luckily) I haven't missed an important shot because of that.
I am able to replicate the problem. If you push the lens all the way back into the barrel before it power down this lens lose the AF requiring a reboot with unlock twist and relock (no need to unmount the lens). I at times when recapping the lens would sometimes press the lens back into the barrel before putting back into my camera waist bag.
Was able to replicate the problem. If you push the lens barrel (if extended after shoot) back into the body before it power down it will lose AF capability. To regain AF, this lens need a "reboot" with unlock, twist and relock (no need to dismount the lens). Switching off and on the camera will not work.
Great review, Nicole! You have totally convinced me that I need this lens!
This looks great. I have read the 40mm is really great for video work on the 5Ds as it is nearly silent. I am very tempted. Is the X100 not 35mm equivalent? although there won’t be too much been 35-40mm. This could be my 50mm replacement.
This is a very interesting looking lens, I had no idea what you meant by pancake so I went to see a product link on Amazon. It really is compact, I wonder if Nikon makes something similar? Anybody knows?
Niiice…on my way to get mine NOW…LOL
Niiice…on my way to get mine NOW…LOL
Thanks. Was just on the verge of buying that lens. Think I will now.
FYI, Canon just admitted the issue.. a Firmware update (this Month) will fix the issue…
FYI, Canon just admitted the issue.. a Firmware update (this Month) will fix the issue…
That's good news. This behavior is getting annoying and is frequent enough to have miss 'moment' shots. The 18-135 STM does not seem to exhibit the same "need to reboot" behaviour.
As such does not seem to be specific to STM lens.
That's good news. This behavior is getting annoying and is frequent enough to have miss 'moment' shots. The 18-135 STM does not seem to exhibit the same "need to reboot" behaviour.
As such does not seem to be specific to STM lens.
Just updated Canon 7D new (version 2.0.0) firmware. Will confirm later if it fixes the problem.
Just updated Canon 7D new (version 2.0.0) firmware. Will confirm later if it fixes the problem.
+Fredi Lienhardt is there a press release about it somewhere?
+Fredi Lienhardt is there a press release about it somewhere?
Will be ordering this lens this week! Can't wait to play with it!
Will be ordering this lens this week! Can't wait to play with it!
+Jenney McAnnally It's a lovely lens now that the 'need to reboot' problem is gone. Now eyeing the 20mm F2.8 :) At 40mm on the 7D still too long for food photography without standing up and backing away from the table. However it's excellent for casual portrait across the table. Together with the recent 7D firmware update that allows auto ISO to 6400, am getting more acceptable shots.
+Jenney McAnnally It's a lovely lens now that the 'need to reboot' problem is gone. Now eyeing the 20mm F2.8 :) At 40mm on the 7D still too long for food photography without standing up and backing away from the table. However it's excellent for casual portrait across the table. Together with the recent 7D firmware update that allows auto ISO to 6400, am getting more acceptable shots.
Hi there, Nicole.
Great review on this little wonder.
I’m using mine on the EOS 6D and the way you’ve viewed things is 100% correct.
Also about the ‘minor’ glitch: I have experienced the exact same thing 3 days ago and also this morning (between those days the lens was never detached from the camera).
I thought there was something wrong with the body, but after detaching the lens and snapping it back on it worked (focused) fine.
I still wonder why it does that.
When I bought it some 4 months ago there was no problem :(
I haven’t seen the issue in a very long time, so long that I pretty much forgot about it! I wouldn’t worry about it too much.
Still love the lens and use it all the time, btw. :)